Choose language

7 kwietnia 2020

Does mBank burn coal from Turów mine?

mBank supports the PGE group, one of the most CO2-intensive companies in Europe.

Popular among young people in Czechia and Poland, mBank supports financially the activities of PGE group. In 2015, together with other banks, it granted the company a loan of PLN 3.63 billion. The PGE Group plans to expand the controversial Turów opencast, which destroys underground waters in the region and may deprive 30,000 Czechs from the Liberec border region of access to drinking water.

On March 27, 2020, during an annual general meeting of mBank shareholders, questions regarding mBank's climate policy were raised. Kuba Gogolewski pointed out that in September 2015 mBank signed a long-term loan agreement with PGE, along with other banks, granting it a loan of PLN 3.63 billion.

This is not all of the bank's dirty business. In May 2019, mBank helped Enea issue domestic bonds. At that time, construction of the Ostrołęka C hard coal power plant was underway, and Enea and Energa sought funding for this purpose. Then, in February 2020, mBank granted the mining machines manufacturer Famur a loan of PLN 35 million with a repayment date of 30.06.2022.

Meanwhile, more and more banks are giving up financing for the coal sector. Their clients are beginning to understand that financial institutions, by granting corporate loans or bond issues, enable coal companies to function, and thus are jointly responsible for the climate crisis, destruction of our health and future.


Coal is dirty, greenwashing will not help

mBank is trying to refute allegations that it’s financing the climate disaster, providing arguments about the credit policy towards high-carbon industries from April 2019 and supporting investments in renewable energy. However, taking a closer look at its activities is enough to see that it is pure greenwashing. mBank is far from implementing any sensible climate policy in fear of losing corporate clients from the coal sector.

Although the mBank policy of 2019 excludes direct financing of coal projects, it does not limit the possibility of issuing bonds or granting corporate loans to companies such as PGE, ZE PAK, Enea, Bogdanka, Tauron or Famur that build coal mines and power plants, or produce mining equipment.

mBank boasts of investments in renewable energy. However, the construction of renewable energy sources will not stop a climate catastrophe if it does not go hand in hand with a shift away from coal energy. As long as companies like mBank cooperate with the coal sector, we will not reduce CO2 emissions and we will be moving further away from the objectives of the Paris Agreement.

If mBank really wants to stop supporting the climate crisis, it must first of all cease cooperation with companies involved in the coal sector, such as: PGE (which, among others, plans to expand the Turów open pit, depriving Czechs of water), ZE PAK, Enea, Bogdanka, Tauron or Famur.


Why not follow suit?

The main shareholder of mBank is the German Commerzbank, which has a very progressive climate policy. If mBank followed the example of its parent company, it would be one of the greenest banks in Poland next year.
There are also many role models on the Polish market. Credit Agricole in a policy announced in June 2019 has committed itself to completely abandon coal in its investment portfolio by 2030, in all EU and OECD countries, as well as to cease cooperation with corporations that are currently developing or planning coal-related investments (in mining , coal-fired power plants, machinery and transport infrastructure).

Unfortunately, instead of following the green trends, mBank has a financial policy that allows it to support companies such as PGE, which has just obtained the licence from the Ministry of Climate for further operation of the Turów opencast. Its activities may deprive the inhabitants of the Liberec Region of water, it also generates significant noise and air pollution by dust.

Is the management board not afraid that young people from Poland, Czech Republic and Slovakia, who often use mBank services, will no longer want to support the bank financing the climate crisis?


Complete coal extraction by 2044 in Turów is not a feasible option. More and (...)
In late April 2020 Polish Energy Group (PGE), the owner of the Turów mine (...)
The lawsuit presented by the Czech Republic at the European Court of Justice was (...)
Poland has sent its response to the Court of Justice of the European Union (...)
It’s highly unlikely Turów will be operating after 2026, argues Polish think-tank - Instrat. (...)
In Poland, the dispute over Turów is getting more entrenched every day. Activists are (...)
Only the 9th time in the history of the EU one Member State sues (...)
Saxony and Liberec region inhabitants are fed up with PGE arrogance and its ignoring (...)
Despite criticism from the EU, Poland wants to extend mining (...)
PGE vs rest of the world
Opencast lignite mining in Turow causes dispute at EU level (...)
Lignite’s agony artificially delayed
An open door to the Court of Justice
Turów is a threat to our cultural heritage
The Polish response to Turów case is "unacceptable"
Pressure makes sense. ICPO has decided that Turów is an (...)
People are tweeting about Turów
A problem taller than skyscrapers
Turów operations against the precautionary and prevention principles
News about Turów is spreading in Germany
Who will pay for water for the Turów opencast?
Will Poland face the European Court of Justice because of (...)
PGE needs to put their cards on the table
PGE caught in between
Shoulder to shoulder against the opencast mines. Video report from (...)
In solidarity against Turów and Garzweiler lignite mines. International kayaking (...)
Turów dispute continued
Europe divided on the Tripoint
PETI Committee press release
Let’s meet at the Three-Nations-Point
Leaving lignite is inevitable
PGE deprives region’s opportunity to develop
Turów violates EU water regulations
Turoszow transition
Lot of noise about Turów in June
The European Union takes a closer look at the license (...)
Opencasts under scrutiny of Rzeczpospolita
EURACTIV: Czech lawsuit against Poland?
Post-mining lakes in Turów and Bełchatów
About how the Czechs carried coal through the mountains and (...)
EC replies to the parliamentary question
Banco Santander supports PGE
Does mBank burn coal from Turów mine?
How PGE Turów uses shock
Emissions do not stop at the border
The crisis is a dead cert
The city of Zittau appeals
Poland prolonged the mining licence for Turów
Official PGE statement from 24 March 2020
Thirst for justice: communities take on coal giant for stealing (...)
Response to the parliamentary question on Turów mine
Petition in the European Parliament
Czech citizens filed the petition
Sign petition!
Licencja Creative Commons Content collected on the site are available under a Creative Commons license